Pointtown vs Gendama 2026 — Two veterans compared by category
Comparing the Two Veterans by Their Core Character
Pointtown and Gendama are both long-established point sites with over 20 years of operation. Both cover a wide range of tasks—from major shopping malls to surveys and games—which is why many users wonder "which one should I use?" However, these two services differ clearly in their operating company, cashout design, content direction, referral system, and membership tier structure. Understanding which platform fits your usage style for each type of task is the key to making the most of both.
Since cashback rates and available campaigns change over time, this article focuses on the structural characteristics and personality differences of each platform. Always check Pointnavi for the latest task details and actual cashback amounts. For in-depth guides on each platform, see the Pointtown Deep Dive and Gendama Deep Dive.
| Item | Pointtown | Gendama |
|---|---|---|
| Operator | GMO Media (TSE Standard listed) | Real World Co., Ltd. (unlisted) |
| Point unit rate | 1 pt = ¥1 | 10 pt = ¥1 |
| Minimum cashout | ¥100 (low threshold) | ¥300 |
| Cashout options | Bank transfer / Edy / PayPay etc. | Multiple options via Real Pay |
| Referral system | 2-tier (direct referrals) | 3-tier (referrals + their referrals) |
| Family accounts | Allowed (different email & phone per member) | Basically one account per person |
| Unique content | Surveys, mini-games, lotteries | Gendama Dentetsu and other original games |
| Membership tiers | Yes (higher tiers get exchange benefits etc.) | Yes (Gold, Platinum, etc.) |
| Years in operation | 20+ years | 20+ years |
The point unit rate—"1 pt = ¥1" vs "10 pt = ¥1"—changes the meaning of any displayed number entirely. "2,000 pt cashback" could be ¥2,000 or ¥200 depending on the site. Always compare in yen after conversion. (Pointnavi shows all platforms already converted to yen.)
Operator Character — What Does Listed vs. Unlisted Mean for You?
Pointtown is operated by GMO Media, a TSE Standard listed company within the GMO Internet Group—a large IT and financial infrastructure conglomerate covering securities, FX, domain registration, hosting, and more. As a publicly listed entity, it is legally required to disclose financials and maintain internal controls.
Gendama is operated by Real World Co., Ltd., which is unlisted. There is no legal obligation to publish financial information, and while decision-making may be faster, the level of external transparency is not as high as Pointtown's. That said, Real World has maintained its service for over 20 years with a user base exceeding 10 million, building a long track record of reliability in the industry.
It would be an oversimplification to say "listed = safe, unlisted = risky," but if you prioritize a sense of security in terms of risk management and information disclosure, Pointtown (GMO Group) offers a more assessable capital background. When choosing a site you plan to use long-term as your main cashback platform, operator stability is a legitimate factor in your decision.
The Point Unit Trap — "Same Number" Can Mean Very Different Value
One of the most common mistakes when comparing point sites is overlooking the difference in point unit rates. Pointtown uses "1 pt = ¥1" while Gendama uses "10 pt = ¥1." Task listing pages prominently display "points earned," but without knowing the unit rate, you can't accurately judge the actual value.
For example: "500 pt" at Pointtown equals ¥500, while "5,000 pt" at Gendama also equals ¥500. Judging that "Gendama must be better because the number is bigger" is a classic comparison mistake.
Pointtown also has a sub-unit called "coins" for values under ¥1 (100 coins = 1 pt), letting small fractions accumulate from low-value tasks. Pointnavi converts all platforms to yen before displaying them side by side, so you can compare real values without worrying about unit differences.
Always compare using yen-converted figures. Pointnavi's task listing already shows all platforms in yen, making direct comparison easy.
Cashout Route Differences — Speed, Fees, and Destination Options
The design philosophy behind cashing out earned points differs significantly between Pointtown and Gendama—a difference that goes beyond task categories and influences which platform you choose as your main.
| Cashout destination | Pointtown | Gendama |
|---|---|---|
| Cash (bank transfer) | Same-day to GMO Aozora Net Bank; other banks take a few business days | Via Real Pay intermediary, takes a few business days |
| Electronic money | Edy, etc. | Rakuten Edy, nanaco, and more |
| Common points | Ponta, Rakuten, etc. | Rakuten, Ponta, d-points, etc. |
| Gift cards | Amazon gift cards, etc. | Amazon, library cards, etc. |
| Minimum cashout | ¥100 | ¥300 |
Pointtown's biggest advantage is same-day transfer to GMO Aozora Net Bank. For users who want immediate access to cash or prefer regular withdrawals, the speed difference is noticeable. Having a GMO Aozora Net Bank account often eliminates transfer fees, making it cost-efficient.
Gendama's cashout process routes through an intermediary service called "Real Pay." While the range of cashout destinations is broad, it falls behind Pointtown in immediacy. That said, if you're the type who consolidates withdrawals once a month anyway, same-day processing may not matter much to you. Choose based on your personal cashout style (frequency, amount, and preferred destination).
For minimum cashout amounts, Pointtown's ¥100 threshold suits users who like to cash out small amounts frequently. Gendama's ¥300 minimum fits a style of accumulating more before withdrawing.
The immediacy of cashing out and whether a relay is involved can be chosen to fit you better when considered together with the exchange-route design of "what exit you ultimately use for the points you earn, and how." Whether you are rushing to cash out, or steering toward shared points or miles, the relay services and number of steps to insert in between change with the exit. The thinking on route design for cashing out, mile conversion, and gift-card conversion respectively is gathered in our point-exchange route optimization guide, so reading it while comparing the two sites' cash-out styles makes it easier to choose with the exit in view.
Content and Task Character — Strengths by Category
While both platforms cover similar task types, there are differences in which categories each platform invests in most heavily. Since task composition changes regularly, treat the following as directional guidance only—always check current tasks on Pointnavi.
| Category | Pointtown | Gendama |
|---|---|---|
| Shopping (via online stores) | Major EC comprehensive | Major EC comprehensive |
| Furusato Nozei (hometown tax) | Satofuru / Furunavi tasks tend to be strong | Available |
| Surveys | Relatively high number of survey tasks | Available |
| Games / content | Lotteries, mini-games, etc. | Gendama Dentetsu and other original games |
| Free trials / resource requests | Available | Relatively rich in free-type tasks |
| Credit cards / financial | Available | Available |
| Travel / hotels | Available | Available |
| Job listings / career changes | Available | Available |
Furusato Nozei (hometown tax donations) and surveys are categories where Pointtown is known to be relatively competitive. Hometown tax tasks tend to have higher per-task values, and cashback can vary significantly depending on the referral platform chosen—always compare on Pointnavi before routing through any site.
Gendama Dentetsu is Gendama's original game content, letting users earn points while playing. For those who enjoy accumulating points through daily gaming, this content becomes a compelling reason to stick with Gendama. Free-type tasks (free trials, document requests, etc.) are also comparatively abundant on Gendama, making it a low-risk entry point for beginners.
A feature common to both is that high-value credit card and financial tasks tend to show large cashback discrepancies between platforms. For these tasks, "which site has the highest rate right now" is the deciding factor. Don't commit to one site—make it a habit to check Pointnavi's comparison before applying for any financial task.
High-reward cases in credit cards and finance in particular tend to show large differences in points awarded by point site even for the same card, so betting on just one of PointTown or Gendama is a source of missed rewards. Which card case is higher on which site right now, and the thinking on card choice in general, is organized in our card ranking guide, a useful reference when you are unsure which of the two to apply through. In the end, the cross-comparison stance of "route through whichever site is highest at the moment" pays off regardless of genre.
Referral Systems — Gendama's 3-Tier vs. Pointtown's Family Accounts
Referral systems have a major impact on how you use a point site and what kinds of income streams you can build. The two platforms have different design philosophies, so choosing the one that fits your use case matters.
- ① Gendama's "3-Tier Referral"When someone you referred (tier 1) is active, you earn rewards. If that person also refers someone (tier 2), their activity generates rewards for you as well. This structure lets users who can promote the service at scale through blogs or social media build stacking passive income. The chain stops at 3 levels (you → tier 1 → tier 2).
- ② Pointtown's "Family Accounts OK"Even household members living together can create their own accounts as long as they use different email addresses and phone numbers. With Gendama, a family member's activity flows to the referrer as referral income—but with Pointtown, each family member independently accumulates their own points and can cash out or use them on their own schedule. These are fundamentally different designs.
The two systems serve different purposes. If you want to earn by promoting the service to others, Gendama's 3-tier referral is better. If you want the whole family to participate together, Pointtown's family account policy is more suitable. It's not about which is "better"—it's about which fits your actual usage.
Membership Tier Systems — More Activity Means More Benefits
Both platforms have membership tier systems where tiers rise with usage frequency and task completion, unlocking benefits and advantages. However, tier advancement conditions, maintenance requirements, and specific perks change over time—always check each platform's official site for current details.
In Pointtown's tier system, higher tiers reportedly unlock rate advantages when exchanging points and access to exclusive tasks. Maintaining higher tiers requires consistent activity, making this system better suited to users who use tasks regularly every month.
Gendama's tier system (Gold, Platinum, etc.) also gives higher-tier members better priority for survey tasks and campaigns. Combined with game content like Gendama Dentetsu, the system is designed to reward users who log in and stay active daily.
For a general overview of how membership tier systems work across point sites, see the Membership Tier Guide. Note that maintaining a high tier requires ongoing activity—this is true for both platforms.
Which Type of User Does Each Platform Suit?
Now that we've mapped the structural differences, let's look at which usage patterns each platform suits best.
| User type | Pointtown | Gendama |
|---|---|---|
| Values operator reliability | ◎ GMO Group, publicly listed | ○ 20+ years of operation |
| Wants frequent small cashouts | ◎ Minimum ¥100 | △ Minimum ¥300 |
| Needs fast bank transfer | ◎ Same-day to GMO Aozora | △ Via Real Pay intermediary |
| Earns by referring via blog/SNS | ○ 2-tier | ◎ 3-tier (includes tier 2) |
| Wants the whole family to participate | ◎ Family accounts allowed | △ Basically 1 account per person |
| Wants to earn through games/entertainment | ○ Lotteries, mini-games | ◎ Gendama Dentetsu and more |
| Wants low-risk entry with free tasks | ○ | ◎ Abundant free-type tasks |
| Focuses mainly on surveys | ◎ Relatively more task volume | ○ |
| Wants to combine with Furusato Nozei | ◎ Strong task lineup tendency | ○ |
The table above reflects tendencies only. The "strength" of each item can shift with task timing and campaigns. Compare based on "your primary use category" and "your cashout style," then do a per-task comparison before each task—that's the foundation for getting the most without wasting cashback.
In judging the "cash-out style" in the table, deciding in advance where to place your main ecosystem makes it easier to see which of the two suits you. If you decide to steer toward the shared points or cashback of the ecosystem you use most in daily life, you can work backward and choose as your main the one that is strong at that exit. Which ecosystem suits your lifestyle, and the thinking on payments and exchange destinations, is organized in our ecosystem comparison guide, so check it alongside your user-type self-diagnosis.
"Choose One" Is Less Optimal Than "Use Both as Secondary Sites"
After comparing Pointtown and Gendama, neither is overwhelmingly superior to the other. Since they excel in different categories, registering for both and choosing by task is the most sensible approach in practice.
Most advanced point site users are registered at 10–15 platforms and use Pointnavi to compare before routing through any one for a given task. Both Pointtown and Gendama are best positioned as candidates within this "multi-site portfolio."
- ① First, decide on your primary point siteWhen choosing by task breadth and cashback strength, Moppy and Hapitas are often top primary candidates. See Moppy vs. Hapitas Comparison and the Moppy Deep Dive for more.
- ② Register Pointtown and Gendama as "secondary" sitesUse them to capture tasks your primary site doesn't carry, or tasks where these two offer better cashback—especially in furusato nozei, surveys, and gaming categories.
- ③ Always compare per-task on PointnaviThe same task can have widely different cashback values across platforms. For high-value tasks, "who's paying the most right now" makes a big difference—always check Pointnavi right before applying.
- ④ Stick with the platforms you find most comfortable long-termBoth platforms' tier systems reward consistent usage. Limit your "main to develop" platforms to 1–2, and use others flexibly based on per-task comparisons. That's the most efficient approach.
If you're new to point sites, check out the Point Site Selection Guide. Starting with 1–2 sites and gradually expanding to multi-site comparisons as you get comfortable is a sustainable approach that's easier to keep up with.
Common Mistakes and How to Avoid Them
- Comparing by displayed point numbers without accounting for unit rates: Gendama's "10,000 pt" and Pointtown's "1,000 pt" are the same in yen. Always compare after converting to yen. Pointnavi's listing already handles this conversion.
- Locking into one site and missing higher cashback elsewhere: The same task can offer significantly different cashback on different sites. Don't commit to "only Pointtown" or "only Gendama"—compare each task on Pointnavi before routing through any platform.
- Starting to earn without understanding the cashout process: Gendama's cashout involves an intermediary step through Real Pay. If you need cash fast, this delay can catch you off guard. Check the cashout flow before you start.
- Choosing a platform based solely on referral structure: Gendama's 3-tier referral is for users who can promote at scale via blogs or social media. Pointtown's family account policy is for households wanting to participate together. Choose the system that fits your use case, not just the one that sounds better on paper.
- Using sporadically and never benefiting from tier upgrades: Both platforms' tier systems reward consistent activity. Maintaining high tiers also requires ongoing engagement—if you only use the platform occasionally, you won't see much benefit from the tier structure.
- Applying for high-value tasks (credit cards, financial) without comparing first: Credit card and FX account tasks can differ by thousands of yen across platforms. Always check Pointnavi for the highest-paying site right before you apply for any high-value financial task.
Mini Glossary — Key Terms in the Pointtown vs. Gendama Comparison
Understanding the point unit rates and cashout mechanics will help you avoid common misjudgments. Here's a quick overview of each term, its meaning, and the key watchout for comparison and cashout purposes.
| Term | Meaning | Key watchout |
|---|---|---|
| Point unit rate | Whether 1 pt = ¥1 or 10 pt = ¥1 | Compare in yen, not by displayed number |
| Minimum cashout | Minimum balance required to cash out | Pointtown is lower; Gendama suits batch cashouts |
| Real Pay (intermediary) | The relay service Gendama uses for cashout | Less immediate than Pointtown's direct transfer |
| 3-tier referral | Gendama's referral chain extending to tier-2 referrals | Suited for content creators; tier 3+ not included |
| Family accounts | Mechanism allowing household members to register separately | Pointtown: OK with different email/phone per member |
| Membership tier | System granting better perks as usage increases | Maintaining tier requires ongoing activity; both platforms have this |
These are the core concepts for comparing the two platforms. Neither is overwhelmingly superior—they excel in different areas, so the smart move is to register for both and choose by task. Always compare in yen after conversion (Pointnavi's listing is already converted for all platforms). For instant or frequent small cashouts and operator reliability, go with Pointtown. For games, 3-tier referrals, and free tasks, Gendama is the better fit. Never commit to one platform for high-value tasks—compare first.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which should I choose between Pointtown and Gendama?
Does Gendama's "10 pt = ¥1" rate mean it's a worse deal?
Can I use both platforms at the same time?
Which platform is better for Furusato Nozei tasks?
What is Gendama Dentetsu?
I'm new to point sites. Where should I start?
Do points expire? How do I prevent losing them?
What is Gendama's "Real Pay" and how does it affect cashout?
What are the common failures when comparing the two sites?
Where is it most efficient to ultimately gather the points I earned on the two sites?
Measured rewards for popular offers, site by site
Data measured by our regular crawls of each point site. The same offer can pay differently — with different terms — depending on the site.
楽天市場
| Site | Offer (as listed) | Reward (as measured) | Approx. JPY | 90-day range | Measured on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ちょびリッチ | 楽天市場 | 1% | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| モッピー | 楽天市場 | 1.0% | — | No change | 2026-06-10 |
| ハピタス | 楽天市場 | 1 % | — | No change | 2026-06-10 |
| ポイントインカム | 楽天市場 | 1 % | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| ポイントタウン | 楽天市場 | 1% | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| フルーツメール | 楽天市場 | 1.0% | — | No change | 2026-06-12 |
| 楽天 Rebates | 楽天市場 | 0.2% | — | No change | 2026-07-17 |
Yahoo!ショッピング
| Site | Offer (as listed) | Reward (as measured) | Approx. JPY | 90-day range | Measured on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| フルーツメール | 【何度でも利用可能】Yahoo!ショッピング | 1.7% | — | 1.5%〜1.7% | 2026-07-08 |
| Powl | Yahoo!ショッピング(ヤフーショッピング) | 1.3 %還元 | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| モッピー | Yahoo!ショッピング(ヤフーショッピング) | 1.0% | — | No change | 2026-06-10 |
| ハピタス | Yahoo!ショッピング | 1 % | — | 0.8%〜1% | 2026-07-10 |
| ポイントインカム | Yahoo!ショッピング(ヤフーショッピング) | 1 % | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| ポイントタウン | Yahoo!ショッピング | 1% | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| げん玉 | Yahoo!ショッピング (ヤフー株式会社) | 0.8%分のポイント | — | 0.8%〜3500% | 2026-07-07 |
| ちょびリッチ | Yahoo!ショッピング | 0.5% →1% | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
じゃらん
| Site | Offer (as listed) | Reward (as measured) | Approx. JPY | 90-day range | Measured on |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ハピタス | じゃらんnet | 2 % | — | No change | 2026-06-10 |
| ちょびリッチ | じゃらんnet | 1.6% | — | No change | 2026-07-18 |
| ポイントタウン | じゃらんnet | 1.2% | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| Powl | じゃらんパック | 1 %還元 | — | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| げん玉 | じゃらんパック (株式会社リクルートライフスタイル) | 購入金額の0.5%分のポイント | — | 0.5%〜13% | 2026-07-07 |
| モッピー | じゃらんゴルフ | 750P | ≈ 750円 | No change | 2026-06-10 |
| ポイントインカム | じゃらんゴルフ | 5,500 pt | ≈ 550円 | No change | 2026-06-02 |
| フルーツメール | じゃらんゴルフ | 4500P | ≈ 450円 | No change | 2026-06-12 |
※ JPY conversion applies to point-denominated offers only, using each site's point rate (for % offers, compare the rates directly). Measurement dates vary by site, and rewards/terms change — always check each site's latest listing before use. Rows with different offer names may be separate offers with different terms.
This article was written from publicly available information on each point site as of 2026-07-17. Cashback rates, campaign terms, and redemption rules can change without notice — always check each site's official page for the latest. This site uses each point site's referral program, but going through a referral link never changes the rate you receive.